๐๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ด ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐? ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐
Nov 07, 2025Every implementation team operates within a broader organizational context, shaped by both visible and invisible, hard and soft factors. Some aspects fall within the team’s direct sphere of influence, while others depend on senior management and support departments. The success of a project is significantly determined by the level of support from these layers. Yet, one team often appears more successful than another, even under similar conditions.
From a systemic perspective, the hidden steering mechanisms within an organization are particularly intriguing. One of my most frequently used exercises in management training is the 'system lab.' In this exercise, an organization is structured hierarchically, with top management, middle management, and a group of professionals explicitly referred to as ‘bottoms.’ What consistently stands out—regardless of participants' experience—is how hierarchy and its associated underlying dynamics effectively block constructive behavior. Patterns such as us-versus-them thinking, victim mentality, power abuse, judgment, avoidance of problems, sarcasm, and political maneuvering dominate. As a result, sharp divisions emerge between management layers and departments, both horizontally and vertically.
A common misconception is that a healthy structure of tasks and responsibilities is confused with a hierarchical ladder, where being ‘higher up’ is seen as better, or where certain professional backgrounds receive more recognition than others. This is a fundamental organizational dilemma that inevitably leads to fragmentation. The complexity deepens when different hierarchies intersect, such as in family businesses, healthcare, or education. As a university lecturer, I regularly witness well-intentioned innovations falter within the education system. At the same time, research departments often fail to build adequate bridges to education, partly due to their unclear systemic positioning. It is easier to think innovatively from a position with fewer direct responsibilities.
I deeply admire those who, despite opposition and obstacles, continue making progress. Those who manage to rise above the fog, tirelessly and without draining their energy, even when everything seems to be working against them.
What is their secret?